When one has self-declared his or her own sovereignty in a world totally controlled by the incremental and systematic mind programming of humanity, one immediately becomes a vaccuum cleaner for the robotic thought & collective fear patterns of his fellow man. It is an unfortunately daunting reality to wake up to, but such is the unrelenting plight of anyone who seeks truth in the empire of lies, and thus the demanding job begins of planting seeds of light within those who live in the dark.
As such I can think of no better personal example to demonstrate this fact than my own ongoing soul-mission to reboot the mind-programming of our local government ad-hoc committees in regards to the nearly 60 year old forced medication of our citizenry here in the United States. In some of the below videos you will witness first hand the energetic difference between an axiomatic point of view and the helpless flailing of a government stooge who does not have the moral high ground.
The tragic irony of this state policy is that the practice of introducing commercial grade toxic waste to the public water only exacerbates the poisoned state of mind which causes one to succumb to the illogical & irrational thought processes that makes water fluoridation a reality here on the ground. In this spirit please enjoy my most recent video essay which exemplifies this cleansing activity on a microcosmic level, entitled, “Why Doesn’t Government Know Their Own Definition of Medication?” which follows my effort to make use of spiritual awareness and unadulterated logic to educate the nearby OWASA board of directors on what it means to have principled thoughts on a very clear cut & highly unethical issue.
Why Doesn’t Government Know Their Own Definition Of A Medication?
Source: Durham Against Fluoride
In this video-essay I will explore the art of debating the Fluoride issue, but vicariously & more importantly expose the frightening reality that our civil servants, the ones we pay with our tax dollars, do not even understand the basic definition of a medication. This is tragic in consideration of the fact that for almost 60 years Durham, Raleigh & Chapel Hill has enforced a mandatory & systematic medication of our public water supplies with what turns out to be a known neurotoxin Sodium Fluoride & Hydrofluorosilicic Acid.
As a primer please watch Chair of the Orange Water and Sewer Authority Alan Rimer express his utter incompetence on this subject during a “NRTS” meeting, which is closed to public comment & includes Perennial Government Pig & Public Health Terrorist Rebecca King who makes it her job to convince these ad-hoc committees that Fluoride is the best thing since sliced bread.
If you are wondering why bother with this mental exercise I say it is always diligent to point out the illegitimacy of our public servant’s arguments when they are claiming to provide a service that we do not want.
There are two main branches to the anti-fluoridation argument, as I see it:
1) One has versed themselves in some of the peer reviewed science which has been published since the compulsory fluoridation program first began in the 1950′s, and is concerned with adverse health risks associated with this policy.
2) A principled disagreement with the concept of forced medication via the public water supply.
Naturally one should be able to fuse both branches into a firm stance, especially if he or she is well learned in the clinical/scientific area. Eventually in arguments the problem arises though how to reconcile #1, if in the case of #2 you must call it a medication? Unfortunately in today’s pharmacrazy society the word medication is often considered to have a positive connotation, whereas if you call Fluoridation a “poison” this requires you bear the burden of proof & engage in that discussion about the possible benefits in contrast to your perceived damage. For arguments the waters become muddy very quickly in this later scenario & results in a less successful expose if you are not prepared to have that scientific discussion.
This is why a fluoride activist should always be as scientifically prepared as possible, else you may end up being deceived or run roughshod over by the dizzying hypocrisy and confusion exhibited below courtesy Allan Spalt. Realizing how muddy the waters have become is always a sobering moment:
But what happens when one makes only the argument that he disagrees with the concept of being medicated through the water supply?
As I will show below, even when using the government’s own terminology to have a rational discussion the minions of the system CAN NOT COMPUTE and will sometimes resort to diversion, perverting the facts, or outright lying to maintain the upper hand.
The only unfortunate caveat to this perspective is that it must inherently use the language of those in Government, who themselves claim a preventative benefit derived from the introduction of Fluoride to our water supply which defines it as medication -
Even though I also object to the assertion that there is some benefit derived.
In this spirit I appeared at the OWASA public meeting April 25 to ask the question “Does the OWASA board believe that they have the authority to medicate our water supply?”
To which the appointed OWASA Chair Alan Rimer says,
“That’s a Rhetorical question. The Board doesn’t need to answer that.”
The very next month OWASA Appointee Terri Buckner either reveals her stunning ignorance on the matter or issues the audience a bold face lie when she claims the Federal Drug Administration “does not define Fluoride as a drug.”
This, despite my prior appearance which offered a completely self evident truth that can not be refuted.
No matter what her reason for saying this falsehood, I will not be going to the State Board of Health as she suggests I will be asking her directly June 13 at the next OWASA board meeting & holding her accountable for these silly statements.
Please enjoy these events juxtaposed, and stay tuned for the next update.
If this juxtaposition does not hit your lie detector, please just follow this very simple equation:
A principled mind should easily grasp a proof which make the position self evident, and I have attempted to do this below & in the video above:
1) The Government says Fluoride is added to the water supply because they allege it prevents cavities
3) Therefore, the one SINGLE argument ever perpetrated by pro-fluoridationists has to be at bare minimum considered “medication of the drinking water.”
One must then ask, since this is such an easy concept, why do those in Government who proudly proclaim on their websites that Fluoride is added to the water for “dental health,” not even admit this basic fact in a face to face meeting?
The answer is two fold-
1) In the most correct sense what the Government is doing by medicating the water supply is already illegal. This is true for many more ethical & legal reasons than just the Federal Drug Administration’s requirement that you have a medical license & write a prescription to administer medicine to another person. But that ought to be enough.
Of all people, Pharmacist & Mayor of Raleigh Nancy MacFarlane should get this but she is a complicit liar and will stubbornly stare you dead in the face without giving a damn about the state policy to hurt your family. See below:
2) The Bureaucrats are allergic to the term medication because it implies a level of culpability, and since they subconsciously realize they do not have the moral high ground and are in fact fully aware that this is a corrosive toxic waste product of the aluminum & fertilizer industries, they do not want to be reminded of their acquiescence with a state-run eugenics operation which has wrought incalculable damage in the form of lost IQ, premature death, & systemic disease onto humankind.
Watch this phenomenon play out in real time as I educate people well advanced in age compared to me on how to be principled in their thinking. Do not make the mistake of confusing my tenacity for pleasure – I wish I did not have to endure this mind numbing discussion but it is one that needs to be had for the good of all.